neiconНаука и научная информацияScholarly Research and Information2658-3143NP «NEICON»10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-3-157-166neicon-56Research ArticleИНФОРМАЦИОННОЕ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ И УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НАУЧНЫМИ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯМИSCHOLARLY INFORMATION AND RESEARCH MANAGEMENTСБОР И АНАЛИЗ СТАТИСТИКИ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ ЭЛЕКТРОННЫХ РЕСУРСОВ ПО COUNTER 5COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCE USAGE STATISTICS ACCORDING TO COUNTER 5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-6288ЛитвиноваН. Н.LitvinovaN. N.

канд. филол. наук, эксперт, ул. Летниковская, 4, стр. 5, офис 2.4, г. Москва, 115114;

главный библиотекарь, ул. Воздвиженка, 3/5, г. Москва, 190019

Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Expert, Letnikovskaya str., 4, bldg 5, off. 2.4, Moscow, 115114;

Chief Librarian, Vozdvizhenka str., 3/5, Moscow, 190019

nlit@neicon.ruНекоммерческое партнерство «Национальный электронно-информационный консорциум» (НЭИКОН); Российская государственная библиотекаРоссияNon-profit Partnership “National Electronic Information Consortium” (NEICON) Russian State LibraryRussian Federation20192309201923157166Copyright © Литвинова Н.Н., 20192019Литвинова Н.Н.Litvinova N.N.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://05x01x01x01x03.ejs-01.elpub.dev/jour/article/view/56

В статье рассматривается развитие проекта COUNTER, являющегося стандартом де-факто предоставления статистических данных об использовании лицензионных электронных ресурсов. Показано, какие проблемы его организации привели к серьезной переработке стандарта с 2016 по 2018 год для ввода в действие пятой версии COUNTER. Описана трехкомпонентная структура модели «объекты — метрики — атрибуты». Продемонстрированы новые возможности генерации статистических отчетов, позволяющие свободно комбинировать различные атрибуты и метрики для измеряемых объектов. Описаны и прокомментированы стандартизованные отчеты, вводимые новым стандартом. Проанализированы изменения в данных об использовании, связанные с вводом в действие новых метрик. Подчеркнута важность согласованных параметров генерации статистики контент-провайдерами, не предоставляющими отчеты в соответствии со стандартом COUNTER.

The development of COUNTER usage statistics code of practice (de facto standard) during 2003–2016 is considered. It is demonstrated what issues in developing four successive versions of standard resulted in its substantial redesign fulfilled during 2016–2018 and implemented in COUNTER 5. New conceptual structure of COUNTER 5 (effective from January 1st, 2019) with its three components “objects — metrics — attributes” is described. New opportunities of statistical reports generation allowing to combine different attributes and metrics are analyzed. New standard reports are described and commented. Differences in summary statistics data compared to previous year data are explained. The importance of standardized usage data from content providers not COUNTER compliant yet is stressed.

электронные ресурсыстатистика использованиястандартизацияCOUNTERконцептуальная модельобъектыметрикиатрибутыединицы контентаelectronic resourcesusage statisticsstandardizationCOUNTERconceptual modelobjectsmetricsattributescontent unitsReferencesShepherd P.T. COUNTER: from conception to compliance. Learned Publishing. 2003;16(3):201–205. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103322110996Shepherd P.T. COUNTER: from conception to compliance. Learned Publishing. 2003;16(3):201–205. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103322110996Shepherd P.T. COUNTER: towards reliable vendor usage statistics. Vine. 2004;34(4):184–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720410570975Shepherd P.T. COUNTER: towards reliable vendor usage statistics. Vine. 2004;34(4):184–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720410570975Shepherd P.T. COUNTER 2005: a new Code of Practice and new applications of COUNTER usage statistics. Learned Publishing. 2005;18(4):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315105774648762Shepherd P.T. COUNTER 2005: a new Code of Practice and new applications of COUNTER usage statistics. Learned Publishing. 2005;18(4):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315105774648762Pesch O. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, Part 1: Project COUNTER. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v50n01_14Pesch O. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, Part 1: Project COUNTER. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/ J123v50n01_14Kraemer A. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, part 2: working with use data for electronic journals. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v50n01_15Kraemer A. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, part 2: working with use data for electronic journals. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v50n01_15Baker G., Read E.J. Vendor-supplied usage data for electronic resources: a survey of academic libraries. Learned Publishing. 2008;21(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X247276Baker G., Read E.J. Vendor-supplied usage data for electronic resources: a survey of academic libraries. Learned Publishing. 2008;21(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X247276Welker J. Counting on COUNTER: The Current State of E-Resource Usage Data in Libraries. Computers in Libraries. 2012;32(9):6–11.Welker J. Counting on COUNTER: The Current State of E-Resource Usage Data in Libraries. Computers in Libraries. 2012;32(9):6–11.Pesch O. COUNTER Release 5: What’s New and What It Means to Libraries. The Serials Librarian. 2017;73(3–4):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361 526X.2017.1391153Pesch O. COUNTER Release 5: What’s New and What It Means to Libraries. The Serials Librarian. 2017;73(3–4):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/036 1526X.2017.1391153Tenopir C., Christian L., Anderson R., Estelle L., Allard S., Nicholas D. Beyond the download: Issues in developing a secondary usage calculator. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 2017;5(2):365–377.Tenopir C., Christian L., Anderson R., Estelle L., Allard S., Nicholas D. Beyond the download: Issues in developing a secondary usage calculator. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 2017;5(2):365–377.Estelle L. COUNTER: Release 5 of the Code of Practice. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2017;18(3):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm10-2017-0048Estelle L. COUNTER: Release 5 of the Code of Practice. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2017;18(3):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm10-2017-0048Osterman A., Estelle L., Pesch O. COUNTER: Consistency, Clarity, Simplification, and Continuous Maintenance. Purdue e-Pubs. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316678Osterman A., Estelle L., Pesch O. COUNTER: Consistency, Clarity, Simplification, and Continuous Maintenance. Purdue e-Pubs. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316678Davis P.M., Price J.S. eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006;57(9):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20405 13. Needham P., Stone G. IRUS-UK: making scholarly statistics count in UK repositories. Insight. 2012;25(3):262–266. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.3.262Davis P.M., Price J.S. eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006;57(9):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20405Литвинова Н.Н. Эволюция представлений о фондах библиотек под влиянием электронной среды. Библиотековедение. 2016;1(1):25–31. 15. Литвинова Н.Н., Хахалева Н.И. Учет электронных сетевых удаленных документов в библиотеках. Библиотековедение. 2014;1:35–41.Needham P., Stone G. IRUS-UK: making scholarly statistics count in UK repositories. Insight. 2012;25(3):262–266. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048- 7754.25.3.262Litvinova N.N. Evolution of Concept of Library Collections under the Impact of Electronic Environment. Bibliotekovedenie. 2016;1(1):25–31 (In Russ.).Litvinova N.N. Evolution of Concept of Library Collections under the Impact of Electronic Environment. Bibliotekovedenie. 2016;1(1):25–31 (In Russ.).Litvinova N.N., Khakhaleva N.I. Registering of Electronic Network Remote Documents in Libraries. Bibliotekovedenie. 2014;1:35–41 (In Russ.).Litvinova N.N., Khakhaleva N.I. Registering of Electronic Network Remote Documents in Libraries. Bibliotekovedenie. 2014;1:35–41 (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.